All coverage
Milestone note Sep 16, 2026

SK hynix and Intel are in talks after all — but not about the thing SK hynix denied

Reuters reported on 16 September that SK hynix is in talks with Intel about manufacturing memory chips in the US for the first time — options include leasing part of Intel's Ohio complex or a venture with Intel and cloud buyers. Two weeks ago SK hynix denied a report that it was weighing Intel Foundry for HBM4E base dies. Both can be true: they are different deals.

Reuters reported on 16 September 2026 that SK hynix is in talks with Intel over a potential agreement to manufacture memory chips in the United States for the first time. One option under discussion is SK hynix leasing part of Intel's long-delayed Ohio semiconductor complex; another is a venture with Intel and major cloud companies seeking stable memory supply. The talks are exploratory, with no decision on structure or on which memory products would be made. Intel declined to comment while saying it remains committed to preparing the Ohio site. SK hynix is already building a $4B advanced-packaging plant in Indiana but makes no memory wafers in the US. Both companies' shares rose on the report.

Why it matters

Two weeks ago we ran a piece on a carefully worded denial. Herald Economy had reported SK hynix was weighing Intel as a second source for the HBM4E base dies that currently come entirely from TSMC; SK hynix said it was "not currently considering Intel Foundry for HBM4E" and called parts of the report inaccurate without saying which parts. We declined to file the story as refuted, on the grounds that supplier-diversification talks are the kind of thing a company denies truthfully at one stage and announces at another.

That reading holds, and the precision matters more than the vindication. This is not the HBM4E story. Base dies are a logic part fabricated by a foundry; what Reuters describes is memory wafer manufacturing — a fab, a lease, possibly a joint venture — which is a different product, a different Intel business unit, and a different denial. SK hynix could have been literally accurate on 1 September and still be in the room on 16 September. Anyone treating today's report as proof the earlier denial was false is making the same category error the original coverage made.

What the two stories share is the direction. SK hynix has no US memory fab, its customers are American hyperscalers, and the political pressure to build domestically is not subtle. Intel has an unfinished Ohio complex and a foundry business that needs anchor tenants. A structure where cloud buyers co-invest alongside is the interesting variant, because it would make the customers of memory into part-owners of its supply — the same pattern as Qualcomm handing Amazon warrants against future purchases, arriving in a second market within a fortnight.

Nothing is decided. The tracker records qualified relationships, not reported talks, and still has nothing to add.

What to watch

Whether a structure is announced and whether cloud companies are actually in it, whether the HBM4E base-die question is ever answered separately, and whether Ohio gets a completion date.

Who's involved